lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50A2F7C9.2030006@xdin.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:45:46 +0000
From:	Arvid Brodin <Arvid.Brodin@...n.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Cyrill Gorcunov" <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/proc: Add process text segment md5-summing

On 2012-11-13 03:16, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> To add another nail in the coffin.
> 
> You can do this with ptrace or with /proc/<pid>/mem without a kernel
> patch.
> 
> To make this safe would need a ptrace_may_acces(PTRACE_MODE_READ)
> permission check.  At which point not doing this with ptrace just adds
> up to extra kernel maintenance for no real point.

If my client still wants to run text segment checks, even after the
criticism of the idea behind the patch, the above should prove very
handy. Thanks!


-- 
Arvid Brodin | Consultant (Linux)
XDIN AB | Knarrarnäsgatan 7 | SE-164 40 Kista | Sweden | xdin.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ