[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1211140254020.6949@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 03:03:02 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] mm, oom: ensure sysrq+f always passes valid
zonelist
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > With hotpluggable and memoryless nodes, it's possible that node 0 will
> > not be online, so use the first online node's zonelist rather than
> > hardcoding node 0 to pass a zonelist with all zones to the oom killer.
>
> Makes sense although I haven't seen a machine with no 0 node yet.
We routinely do testing with them, actually, just by physically removing
all memory described by the SRAT that maps to node 0. You could do the
same thing by making all pxms that map to node 0 to be hotpluggable in
your memory affinity structure. I've been bit by it one too many times so
I always keep in mind that no single node id is guaranteed to be online
(although at least one node is always online); hence, first_online_node is
the solution.
> According to 13808910 this is indeed possible.
>
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
>
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists