[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW3uBWgJfftFxnf8qySBmqSRDRhoivBdk6Zsc+cC2Sitg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:48:22 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: new architectures, time_t __kernel_long_t
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> The other types that are used as 64 bit on x32 are ino_t, nlink_t,
> size_t, ssize_t, ptrdiff_t, and off_t.
>
> Obviously, we want to use 64-bit off_t, but this is achieved already
> through loff_t, which is used in all places in the asm-generic
> ABI anyway (the syscalls using off_t are stripped out). I don't
Indeed.
> think we want to have the other ones set to 64 bit on ARC or Meta,
> although I'm not 100% sure about ino_t and nlink_t.
Is ino_t related to inode numbers stored in on-disk file system metadata?
Currently, nlink_t is unconditionally __u32, even on 64-bit.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists