[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hz11T2oy5ohBE16snuzq1cmUn3M_6Q57qzrjH=PmiYiZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:48:12 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vtime: Remove the underscore prefix invasion
2012/11/14 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>:
> On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 17:26 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> Prepending irq-unsafe vtime APIs with underscores was actually
>> a bad idea as the result is a big mess in the API namespace that
>> is even waiting to be further extended. Also these helpers
>> are always called from irq safe callers except kvm. Just
>> provide a vtime_account_system_irqsafe() for this specific
>> case so that we can remove the underscore prefix on other
>> vtime functions.
>>
>
>
>> -void __vtime_account_system(struct task_struct *tsk)
>> +void vtime_account_system(struct task_struct *tsk)
>> {
>> cputime_t delta = vtime_delta(tsk);
>
> Should we add a WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()) check here?
Why not, I'll add one in vtime_delta().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists