[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1352935816.18025.75.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:30:16 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...il.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: need to expose sched_clock to correlate user
samples with kernel samples
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 14:26 -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> > There's also trace_clock_counter() which isn't even a clock :-) It's
> > just a incremental atomic counter that goes up every time it's called.
> > This is the most synced clock, but is absolutely meaningless for
> > timestamps. It's just a way to show ordered events.
>
> Oof. This is getting uglier. I'd really prefer not to expose all these
> different internal clocks out userland. Especially via clock_gettime().
Actually, I would be happy to just expose them to modules. As things
like hwlat_detect could use them.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists