| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1352864585.18025.54.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:43:05 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: shuah.khan@...com, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
roland@...estorage.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
shuahkhan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] intel-iommu: Fix AB-BA lockdep report
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 19:34 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> I had to edit the path to the file, but it looks like it applies
> properly now, thanks.
Thanks,
Just in case, below is what I applied to v3.0-rt.
-- Steve
>From fd92bf3e21c77fe06647b57feebb1b52da54969a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:22:21 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Fix AB-BA lockdep report
When unbinding a device so that I could pass it through to a KVM VM, I
got the lockdep report below. It looks like a legitimate lock
ordering problem:
- domain_context_mapping_one() takes iommu->lock and calls
iommu_support_dev_iotlb(), which takes device_domain_lock (inside
iommu->lock).
- domain_remove_one_dev_info() starts by taking device_domain_lock
then takes iommu->lock inside it (near the end of the function).
So this is the classic AB-BA deadlock. It looks like a safe fix is to
simply release device_domain_lock a bit earlier, since as far as I can
tell, it doesn't protect any of the stuff accessed at the end of
domain_remove_one_dev_info() anyway.
BTW, the use of device_domain_lock looks a bit unsafe to me... it's
at least not obvious to me why we aren't vulnerable to the race below:
iommu_support_dev_iotlb()
domain_remove_dev_info()
lock device_domain_lock
find info
unlock device_domain_lock
lock device_domain_lock
find same info
unlock device_domain_lock
free_devinfo_mem(info)
do stuff with info after it's free
However I don't understand the locking here well enough to know if
this is a real problem, let alone what the best fix is.
Anyway here's the full lockdep output that prompted all of this:
=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.39.1+ #1
-------------------------------------------------------
bash/13954 is trying to acquire lock:
(&(&iommu->lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<ffffffff812f6421>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230
but task is already holding lock:
(device_domain_lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff812f6508>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x208/0x230
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (device_domain_lock){-.-...}:
[<ffffffff8109ca9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x130
[<ffffffff81571475>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x55/0xa0
[<ffffffff812f8350>] domain_context_mapping_one+0x600/0x750
[<ffffffff812f84df>] domain_context_mapping+0x3f/0x120
[<ffffffff812f9175>] iommu_prepare_identity_map+0x1c5/0x1e0
[<ffffffff81ccf1ca>] intel_iommu_init+0x88e/0xb5e
[<ffffffff81cab204>] pci_iommu_init+0x16/0x41
[<ffffffff81002165>] do_one_initcall+0x45/0x190
[<ffffffff81ca3d3f>] kernel_init+0xe3/0x168
[<ffffffff8157ac24>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
-> #0 (&(&iommu->lock)->rlock){......}:
[<ffffffff8109bf3e>] __lock_acquire+0x195e/0x1e10
[<ffffffff8109ca9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x130
[<ffffffff81571475>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x55/0xa0
[<ffffffff812f6421>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230
[<ffffffff812f8b42>] device_notifier+0x72/0x90
[<ffffffff8157555c>] notifier_call_chain+0x8c/0xc0
[<ffffffff81089768>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x78/0xb0
[<ffffffff810897b6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
[<ffffffff81373a5c>] __device_release_driver+0xbc/0xe0
[<ffffffff81373ccf>] device_release_driver+0x2f/0x50
[<ffffffff81372ee3>] driver_unbind+0xa3/0xc0
[<ffffffff813724ac>] drv_attr_store+0x2c/0x30
[<ffffffff811e4506>] sysfs_write_file+0xe6/0x170
[<ffffffff8117569e>] vfs_write+0xce/0x190
[<ffffffff811759e4>] sys_write+0x54/0xa0
[<ffffffff81579a82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
other info that might help us debug this:
6 locks held by bash/13954:
#0: (&buffer->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811e4464>] sysfs_write_file+0x44/0x170
#1: (s_active#3){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff811e44ed>] sysfs_write_file+0xcd/0x170
#2: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81372edb>] driver_unbind+0x9b/0xc0
#3: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81373cc7>] device_release_driver+0x27/0x50
#4: (&(&priv->bus_notifier)->rwsem){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8108974f>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x5f/0xb0
#5: (device_domain_lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff812f6508>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x208/0x230
stack backtrace:
Pid: 13954, comm: bash Not tainted 2.6.39.1+ #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff810993a7>] print_circular_bug+0xf7/0x100
[<ffffffff8109bf3e>] __lock_acquire+0x195e/0x1e10
[<ffffffff810972bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10
[<ffffffff8109d57d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13d/0x180
[<ffffffff8109ca9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x130
[<ffffffff812f6421>] ? domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230
[<ffffffff81571475>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x55/0xa0
[<ffffffff812f6421>] ? domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230
[<ffffffff810972bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10
[<ffffffff812f6421>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230
[<ffffffff812f8b42>] device_notifier+0x72/0x90
[<ffffffff8157555c>] notifier_call_chain+0x8c/0xc0
[<ffffffff81089768>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x78/0xb0
[<ffffffff810897b6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
[<ffffffff81373a5c>] __device_release_driver+0xbc/0xe0
[<ffffffff81373ccf>] device_release_driver+0x2f/0x50
[<ffffffff81372ee3>] driver_unbind+0xa3/0xc0
[<ffffffff813724ac>] drv_attr_store+0x2c/0x30
[<ffffffff811e4506>] sysfs_write_file+0xe6/0x170
[<ffffffff8117569e>] vfs_write+0xce/0x190
[<ffffffff811759e4>] sys_write+0x54/0xa0
[<ffffffff81579a82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>
---
drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
index 8c2564d..bc05a51 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
@@ -3569,6 +3569,8 @@ static void domain_remove_one_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain,
found = 1;
}
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+
if (found == 0) {
unsigned long tmp_flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->iommu_lock, tmp_flags);
@@ -3585,8 +3587,6 @@ static void domain_remove_one_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->lock, tmp_flags);
}
}
-
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
}
static void vm_domain_remove_all_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain)
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists