[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50A4A9A9.5050903@gaisler.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:36:57 +0100
From: Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>
To: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
CC: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
software@...sler.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] i2c: i2c-ocores: Add support for the GRLIB port
of the controller and custom getreg and setreg functions
On 2012-11-13 23:45, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Andreas> The registers in the GRLIB port of the controller are 32-bit
> Andreas> and in big endian byte order. The PRELOW and PREHIGH registers
> Andreas> are merged into one register. The subsequent registers have
> Andreas> their offset decreased accordingly. Hence the register access
> Andreas> needs to be handled in a non-standard manner using custom
> Andreas> getreg and setreg functions.
>
> Andreas> @@ -257,6 +300,14 @@ static int ocores_i2c_of_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>
> Andreas> of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "reg-io-width",
> Andreas> &i2c->reg_io_width);
> Andreas> +
> Andreas> + if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node,
> Andreas> + "aeroflexgaisler,i2cmst")) {
> Andreas> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "GRLIB variant of i2c-ocores\n");
> Andreas> + i2c->setreg = oc_setreg_grlib;
> Andreas> + i2c->getreg = oc_getreg_grlib;
> Andreas> + }
> Andreas> +
>
> Please also update the bindings documentation under
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c.
Sure!
> With this core you need to add both aeroflexgaisler,i2cmst and
> opencores,i2c-ocores to the compatible property, but the grlib variant
> is NOT compatible with i2c-ocores, so that's not really nice.
>
> Adding a type define (TYPE_OCORES / TYPE_GRLIB) and a 2nd of_device_id
> entry with .data = TYPE_GRLIB, and then using that in the probe routine
> would be nicer. Have a look at i2c-at91.c for an example of a driver
> doing something like that.
Yes, that is a good idea. Do you think casting to and from void * in the
following solution is too ugly and rather have a struct pointed to, or do you
think that would be unnecessary?
static struct of_device_id ocores_i2c_match[] = {
{
.compatible = "opencores,i2c-ocores",
.data = (void *)TYPE_OCORES,
},
{
.compatible = "aeroflexgaisler,i2cmst",
.data = (void *)TYPE_GRLIB,
},
{},
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ocores_i2c_match);
static int ocores_i2c_get_type(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
const struct of_device_id *match;
match = of_match_node(ocores_i2c_match, pdev->dev.of_node);
if (match)
return (int)match->data;
else
return TYPE_OCORES;
}
Cheers,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists