linux-kernel - [PART3 Patch v2 04/14] memcontrol: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1352969857-26623-5-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:57:27 +0800
From:	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Lin feng <linfeng@...fujitsu.com>,
	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PART3 Patch v2 04/14] memcontrol: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY

From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>

N_HIGH_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has normal or high memory.
N_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has any memory.

The code here need to handle with the nodes which have memory, we should
use N_MEMORY instead.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c  | 18 +++++++++---------
 mm/page_cgroup.c |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 7acf43b..1b69665 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -800,7 +800,7 @@ static unsigned long mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 	int nid;
 	u64 total = 0;
 
-	for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
+	for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY)
 		total += mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, lru_mask);
 	return total;
 }
@@ -1611,9 +1611,9 @@ static void mem_cgroup_may_update_nodemask(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 		return;
 
 	/* make a nodemask where this memcg uses memory from */
-	memcg->scan_nodes = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY];
+	memcg->scan_nodes = node_states[N_MEMORY];
 
-	for_each_node_mask(nid, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]) {
+	for_each_node_mask(nid, node_states[N_MEMORY]) {
 
 		if (!test_mem_cgroup_node_reclaimable(memcg, nid, false))
 			node_clear(nid, memcg->scan_nodes);
@@ -1684,7 +1684,7 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_reclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool noswap)
 	/*
 	 * Check rest of nodes.
 	 */
-	for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+	for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
 		if (node_isset(nid, memcg->scan_nodes))
 			continue;
 		if (test_mem_cgroup_node_reclaimable(memcg, nid, noswap))
@@ -3759,7 +3759,7 @@ move_account:
 		drain_all_stock_sync(memcg);
 		ret = 0;
 		mem_cgroup_start_move(memcg);
-		for_each_node_state(node, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+		for_each_node_state(node, N_MEMORY) {
 			for (zid = 0; !ret && zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
 				enum lru_list lru;
 				for_each_lru(lru) {
@@ -4087,7 +4087,7 @@ static int memcg_numa_stat_show(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
 
 	total_nr = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, LRU_ALL);
 	seq_printf(m, "total=%lu", total_nr);
-	for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+	for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
 		node_nr = mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, LRU_ALL);
 		seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, node_nr);
 	}
@@ -4095,7 +4095,7 @@ static int memcg_numa_stat_show(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
 
 	file_nr = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, LRU_ALL_FILE);
 	seq_printf(m, "file=%lu", file_nr);
-	for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+	for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
 		node_nr = mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid,
 				LRU_ALL_FILE);
 		seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, node_nr);
@@ -4104,7 +4104,7 @@ static int memcg_numa_stat_show(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
 
 	anon_nr = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, LRU_ALL_ANON);
 	seq_printf(m, "anon=%lu", anon_nr);
-	for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+	for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
 		node_nr = mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid,
 				LRU_ALL_ANON);
 		seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, node_nr);
@@ -4113,7 +4113,7 @@ static int memcg_numa_stat_show(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
 
 	unevictable_nr = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, BIT(LRU_UNEVICTABLE));
 	seq_printf(m, "unevictable=%lu", unevictable_nr);
-	for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+	for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
 		node_nr = mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid,
 				BIT(LRU_UNEVICTABLE));
 		seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, node_nr);
diff --git a/mm/page_cgroup.c b/mm/page_cgroup.c
index 5ddad0c..c1054ad 100644
--- a/mm/page_cgroup.c
+++ b/mm/page_cgroup.c
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ void __init page_cgroup_init(void)
 	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
 		return;
 
-	for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+	for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
 		unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
 
 		start_pfn = node_start_pfn(nid);
-- 
1.8.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/