linux-kernel - [PART3 Patch v2 03/14] procfs: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1352969857-26623-4-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:57:26 +0800
From:	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Lin feng <linfeng@...fujitsu.com>,
	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PART3 Patch v2 03/14] procfs: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY

From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>

N_HIGH_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has normal or high memory.
N_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has any memory.

The code here need to handle with the nodes which have memory, we should
use N_MEMORY instead.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/proc/kcore.c    | 2 +-
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/kcore.c b/fs/proc/kcore.c
index 86c67ee..e96d4f1 100644
--- a/fs/proc/kcore.c
+++ b/fs/proc/kcore.c
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int kcore_update_ram(void)
 	/* Not inialized....update now */
 	/* find out "max pfn" */
 	end_pfn = 0;
-	for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+	for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
 		unsigned long node_end;
 		node_end  = NODE_DATA(nid)->node_start_pfn +
 			NODE_DATA(nid)->node_spanned_pages;
diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 90c63f9..2d89601 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -1126,7 +1126,7 @@ static struct page *can_gather_numa_stats(pte_t pte, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		return NULL;
 
 	nid = page_to_nid(page);
-	if (!node_isset(nid, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]))
+	if (!node_isset(nid, node_states[N_MEMORY]))
 		return NULL;
 
 	return page;
@@ -1279,7 +1279,7 @@ static int show_numa_map(struct seq_file *m, void *v, int is_pid)
 	if (md->writeback)
 		seq_printf(m, " writeback=%lu", md->writeback);
 
-	for_each_node_state(n, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
+	for_each_node_state(n, N_MEMORY)
 		if (md->node[n])
 			seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", n, md->node[n]);
 out:
-- 
1.8.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/