linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/15] NFSd state containerization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50A4C28B.8020307@parallels.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:23:07 +0400
From:	Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
CC:	"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...nvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>,
	"Trond.Myklebust@...app.com" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"jlayton@...hat.com" <jlayton@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/15] NFSd state containerization

15.11.2012 02:00, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 06:20:59PM +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> This patch set is my first attempt to containerize NFSv4 state - i.e. make it
>> works in networks namespace context.
>> I admit, that some of this new code could be partially rewritten during future
>> NFSd containerization.
>> But the overall idea look more or less correct to me.
>> So, the main things here are:
>> 1) making nfs4_client network namespace aware.
>> 2) Allocating all hashes (except file_hashtbl and reclaim_str_hashtbl) per
>> network namespace context on NFSd start (not init) and destroying on NFSd
>> state shutdown.
>> 3) Allocating of reclaim_str_hashtbl on legacy tracker start and destroying on
>> legacy tracker stop.
>> 4) Moving of client_lru and close_lru lists to per-net data.
>> 5) Making lundromat network namespace aware.
>
> These look OK and pass my tests.  Jeff, do the revised recovery bits
> look OK?
>
> Have you done any testing?

I've done basic testing. I.e. NFS server start/stop in loop, export, share mount 
on another node and some activity, etc.
NFS server is not ready yet to work on container, so no such testing has been done.

>
> It'd be interesting, for example, to know if there are any pynfs that
> fail against the server in a non-init network namespace, but pass
> normally.
>
> --b.
>


-- 
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/