lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121115104254.3029bca9@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:42:54 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, alan@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] TTY: memory leaks patchset

> This series should go upstream regardless "TTY: move tty buffers to
> tty_port" if we decide to revert that commit due to the reported
> warnings I cannot reproduce and neither catch the root cause.

They seem to be warnings only and very obscure cases. I'd favour that
patch not being reverted simply because the only way we'll find a pattern
is by a lot more reports - and it doesn't seem to be anything but an
annoying log splat.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ