linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmc: Standardise capability type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201211151147.14858.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:47:14 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Standardise capability type

On Thursday 15 November 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
> > There are discrepancies with regards to how MMC capabilities
> > are carried throughout the subsystem. Let's standardise them
> > to elevate any confusion.
> >
> > Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
> > Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> 
> Looks good to me, and these are obviously
> u32 bitfields by design, so:
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/