[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50A5328C.800@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:21:00 -0800
From: Andy Grover <agrover@...hat.com>
To: lrosen@...enlaw.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
target-devel@...r.kernel.org, kcopenhaver@...ate.com,
Richard Fontana <rfontana@...hat.com>,
Marc Fleischmann <mwf@...ingtidesystems.com>,
Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ingtidesystems.com>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, bkuhn@...onservancy.org, tytso@....edu,
andy@...veronline.com
Subject: Re: scsi target, likely GPL violation
Hi all,
First, I do not, and did not, have access to the proprietary OS, which
has been referred to. Otherwise, I would have checked it.
Second, I appreciate that my questions and tentative inferences may not
have been perfect, given that I did not have the complete facts, but I
did try to obtain them from RTS before raising questions in this forum.
But I was not successful.
Third, in retrospect, I think a more measured approach to the dialog
may have been a better course. I am interested in understanding the
situation. My primary goal was to avoid duplicating a lot of work, if
RTS plans to open-source the new features they have added to the
proprietary version.
Fourth, my questions about the GPL’s requirements in this context remain.
Finally, I was, in this thread, speaking on my behalf alone and
at my initiative-- not Red Hat’s, as some may have incorrectly
concluded. I'll be using a personal email account (CC'd) for this issue
in the future, in order to make this more explicit.
Regards -- Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists