[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121115040939.614891641@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:10:13 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Subject: [ 08/66] target: Dont return success from module_init() if setup fails
3.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
commit 0d0f9dfb31e0a6c92063e235417b42df185b3275 upstream.
If the call to core_dev_release_virtual_lun0() fails, then nothing
sets ret to anything other than 0, so even though everything is
torn down and freed, target_core_init_configfs() will seem to succeed
and the module will be loaded. Fix this by passing the return value
on up the chain.
Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c
@@ -3214,7 +3214,8 @@ static int __init target_core_init_confi
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
- if (core_dev_setup_virtual_lun0() < 0)
+ ret = core_dev_setup_virtual_lun0();
+ if (ret < 0)
goto out;
return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists