linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/4] perf, amd: Generalize northbridge constraints code for family 15h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1353015113-13262-3-git-send-email-jacob.shin@amd.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:31:51 -0600
From:	Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] perf, amd: Generalize northbridge constraints code for family 15h

From: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>

Generalize northbridge constraints code for family 10h so that later
we can reuse the same code path with other AMD processor families that
have the same northbridge event constraints.

Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c |   43 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
index d60c5c7..04ef43f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
@@ -188,20 +188,13 @@ static inline int amd_has_nb(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 	return nb && nb->nb_id != -1;
 }
 
-static void amd_put_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
-				      struct perf_event *event)
+static void __amd_put_nb_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
+					   struct perf_event *event)
 {
-	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 	struct amd_nb *nb = cpuc->amd_nb;
 	int i;
 
 	/*
-	 * only care about NB events
-	 */
-	if (!(amd_has_nb(cpuc) && amd_is_nb_event(hwc)))
-		return;
-
-	/*
 	 * need to scan whole list because event may not have
 	 * been assigned during scheduling
 	 *
@@ -247,12 +240,13 @@ static void amd_put_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
   *
   * Given that resources are allocated (cmpxchg), they must be
   * eventually freed for others to use. This is accomplished by
-  * calling amd_put_event_constraints().
+  * calling __amd_put_nb_event_constraints()
   *
   * Non NB events are not impacted by this restriction.
   */
 static struct event_constraint *
-amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+__amd_get_nb_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event,
+			       struct event_constraint *c)
 {
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 	struct amd_nb *nb = cpuc->amd_nb;
@@ -260,12 +254,6 @@ amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
 	int idx, new = -1;
 
 	/*
-	 * if not NB event or no NB, then no constraints
-	 */
-	if (!(amd_has_nb(cpuc) && amd_is_nb_event(hwc)))
-		return &unconstrained;
-
-	/*
 	 * detect if already present, if so reuse
 	 *
 	 * cannot merge with actual allocation
@@ -275,7 +263,7 @@ amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
 	 * because of successive calls to x86_schedule_events() from
 	 * hw_perf_group_sched_in() without hw_perf_enable()
 	 */
-	for (idx = 0; idx < x86_pmu.num_counters; idx++) {
+	for_each_set_bit(idx, c->idxmsk, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
 		if (new == -1 || hwc->idx == idx)
 			/* assign free slot, prefer hwc->idx */
 			old = cmpxchg(nb->owners + idx, NULL, event);
@@ -391,6 +379,25 @@ static void amd_pmu_cpu_dead(int cpu)
 	}
 }
 
+static struct event_constraint *
+amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	/*
+	 * if not NB event or no NB, then no constraints
+	 */
+	if (!(amd_has_nb(cpuc) && amd_is_nb_event(&event->hw)))
+		return &unconstrained;
+
+	return __amd_get_nb_event_constraints(cpuc, event, &unconstrained);
+}
+
+static void amd_put_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
+				      struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	if (amd_has_nb(cpuc) && amd_is_nb_event(&event->hw))
+		__amd_put_nb_event_constraints(cpuc, event);
+}
+
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event,	"config:0-7,32-35");
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(umask,	"config:8-15"	);
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(edge,	"config:18"	);
-- 
1.7.9.5


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/