[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50A5FA32.4000903@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:32:50 +0800
From: Shan Wei <shanwei88@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: Shan Wei <shanwei88@...il.com>, dipankar@...ibm.com,
Kernel-Maillist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] rcu: use __this_cpu_read helper instead of per_cpu_ptr(p,
raw_smp_processor_id())
Shan Wei said, at 2012/11/13 9:52:
> From: Shan Wei <davidshan@...cent.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <davidshan@...cent.com>
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Paul, would you like to pick it up to your tree?
> ---
> no changes vs v3,v2.
> ---
> kernel/rcutree.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index 74df86b..441b945 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -1960,7 +1960,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> struct rcu_node *rnp_old = NULL;
>
> /* Funnel through hierarchy to reduce memory contention. */
> - rnp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, raw_smp_processor_id())->mynode;
> + rnp = __this_cpu_read(rsp->rda->mynode);
> for (; rnp != NULL; rnp = rnp->parent) {
> ret = (ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) ||
> !raw_spin_trylock(&rnp->fqslock);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists