[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50A5FB17.1050208@atmel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:36:39 +0100
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 3/4] pinctrl: at91: Prevent NULL dereference if
of_match_device returns NULL
On 11/15/2012 11:00 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> On 12:58 Thu 15 Nov , Axel Lin wrote:
>> of_match_device() may return NULL.
> this is not possible on at91
>
> and I do a oups here as if we have a NULL pointer which means the driver is
> wrong
Well, okay, but it does not prevent from adding a supplementary check to
mimic every other pinctrl driver and use a common return path to the
of_match_device() function.
So I am not completely against this patch (that I why I added my Acked-by).
>> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
>> ---
>> This resend CC Jean-Christophe.
>>
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
>> index 8490a55..32006c8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
>> @@ -829,13 +829,18 @@ static int __devinit at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> uint32_t *tmp;
>> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> struct device_node *child;
>> + const struct of_device_id *match;
>>
>> if (!np)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> + match = of_match_device(at91_pinctrl_of_match, &pdev->dev)->data;
>> + if (!match)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> info->dev = &pdev->dev;
>> - info->ops = (struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops*)
>> - of_match_device(at91_pinctrl_of_match, &pdev->dev)->data;
>> + info->ops = (struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *) match->data;
>> +
>> at91_pinctrl_child_count(info, np);
>>
>> if (info->nbanks < 1) {
>> @@ -1359,6 +1364,7 @@ static struct of_device_id at91_gpio_of_match[] __devinitdata = {
>> static int __devinit at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> + const struct of_device_id *match;
>> struct resource *res;
>> struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_chip = NULL;
>> struct gpio_chip *chip;
>> @@ -1399,8 +1405,11 @@ static int __devinit at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> goto err;
>> }
>>
>> - at91_chip->ops = (struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops*)
>> - of_match_device(at91_gpio_of_match, &pdev->dev)->data;
>> + match = of_match_device(at91_gpio_of_match, &pdev->dev);
>> + if (!match)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + at91_chip->ops = (struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *) match->data;
>> at91_chip->pioc_virq = irq;
>> at91_chip->pioc_idx = alias_idx;
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists