[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1353027296.7176.312.camel@yhuang-dev>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:54:56 +0800
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX] PM: Fix active child counting when disabled and
forbidden
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 01:55 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, November 16, 2012 01:44:00 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, November 16, 2012 08:36:14 AM Huang Ying wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 10:51 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > >
> > > For this situation, if user "echo auto > .../power/control" for the
> > > device, the runtime PM callbacks of device will be called. I think that
> > > is not intended. So I think it is better to use some kind of flag or
> > > state for that.
> >
> > I'm not sure what situation exactly you have in mind. Care to give an
> > exact scenario?
>
> Ah, I see. When we've just called drv->remove(), there is a window in
> which user space may cause the driver's runtime PM callbacks to be
> executed by changing its attribute to "auto".
>
> So perhaps we should check pci_dev->driver rather than pci_dev->dev.driver
> in the runtime PM callbacks? With a few more changes that should allow us
> to close that race.
Yes. And I think, with pci_dev->driver (after some changes suggested by
Alan), we need not to use pm_runtime_get/put_skip_callbacks().
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists