[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50A648FF.2040707@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:09:03 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/43] mm: numa: Make pte_numa() and pmd_numa() a generic
implementation
On 11/16/2012 06:22 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> It was pointed out by Ingo Molnar that the per-architecture definition of
> the NUMA PTE helper functions means that each supporting architecture
> will have to cut and paste it which is unfortunate. He suggested instead
> that the helpers should be weak functions that can be overridden by the
> architecture.
>
> This patch moves the helpers to mm/pgtable-generic.c and makes them weak
> functions. Architectures wishing to use this will still be required to
> define _PAGE_NUMA and potentially update their p[te|md]_present and
> pmd_bad helpers if they choose to make PAGE_NUMA similar to PROT_NONE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Is uninlining these simple tests really the right thing to do,
or would they be better off as inlines in asm-generic/pgtable.h ?
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists