linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] dma: dw_dmac: check direction properly in dw_dma_cyclic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VcfF9pHCa9wv_2Qr_U1y+ubJEkRvpyiXOZL_7nbPHo8uw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:30:21 +0200
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:	balbi@...com
Cc:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	spear-devel <spear-devel@...t.st.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] dma: dw_dmac: check direction properly in dw_dma_cyclic_prep

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 03:59:16PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> dma_transfer_direction is a normal enum. It means we can't usually use the
>> values as bit fields. Let's adjust this check and move it above the usage of
>> the direction parameter.
>
> why above the direction parameter ? You need to explain why ? Is it just
> because 'it looks nicer' or have you found another bug triggered by
> that ?

Many of current users do something like this:

if (dir == MEM_TO_DEV)
 { ... }
*else*
 { ... }

that potentially could trigger the bug.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/