[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALqZ13upXn+BZhzHOHuudqcQ23-2ZUF9X11qR4ESy0_B4pzRbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:09:14 +0200
From: Johan Meiring <johanmeiring@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: pe1dnn@...at.org, jkosina@...e.cz, standby24x7@...il.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] staging: wlags49_h2: mdd.h: fixes tons of coding
style issues
Will do. Just a quick question: Is it acceptable to submit small
patches even if the main file still fails the checkpatch,pl script?
i.e. is it OK to fix e.g. the first 20 instances of C99 // comment
usage, even if 200 remain afterwards, and then fix them later?
Johan
On 16 November 2012 19:06, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 06:55:11PM +0200, Johan Meiring wrote:
>> This commit sorts out a ton of styling issues, including the use of
>> C99 // comments, spaces before and after tabs, etc. I also took the
>> time to align stuff a little more neatly using tabs. The file is
>> nowhere near ready, but it's a start.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Johan Meiring <johanmeiring@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/mdd.h | 1593 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> 1 file changed, 797 insertions(+), 796 deletions(-)
>
> A patch this big is almost impossible to review, sorry. Please break it
> up into smaller pieces.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists