[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121116115124.c2981abc.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:51:24 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@...hat.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Robert Jennings <rcj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm: remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD"
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:14:47 -0500
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com> wrote:
> > The temptation is to supply a patch that checks if kswapd was woken for
> > THP and if so ignore pgdat->kswapd_max_order but it'll be a hack and not
> > backed up by proper testing. As 3.7 is very close to release and this is
> > not a bug we should release with, a safer path is to revert "mm: remove
> > __GFP_NO_KSWAPD" for now and revisit it with the view to ironing out the
> > balance_pgdat() logic in general.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
>
> Does anyone know if this is queued to go into 3.7 somewhere? I looked
> a bit and can't find it in a tree. We have a few reports of Fedora
> rawhide users hitting this.
Still thinking about it. We're reverting quite a lot of material
lately.
mm-revert-mm-vmscan-scale-number-of-pages-reclaimed-by-reclaim-compaction-based-on-failures.patch
and revert-mm-fix-up-zone-present-pages.patch are queued for 3.7.
I'll toss this one in there as well, but I can't say I'm feeling
terribly confident. How is Valdis's machine nowadays?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists