linux-kernel - Re: Benchmark results: "Enhanced NUMA scheduling with adaptive affinity"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121116200514.GJ8218@suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:05:15 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: Benchmark results: "Enhanced NUMA scheduling with adaptive
 affinity"

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 08:50:18PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:14:28PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > With some shuffling the question on what to consider for merging
> > becomes
> > 
> >
> > 1. TLB optimisation patches 1-3?	 	Patches  1-3
> 
> I assume you mean simply reshuffling 33-35 as 1-3.
> 

Yes.

> > 2. Stats for migration?				Patches  4-6
> > 3. Common NUMA infrastructure?			Patches  7-21
> > 4. Basic fault-driven policy, stats, ratelimits	Patches 22-35
> > 
> > Patches 36-43 are complete cabbage and should not be considered at this
> > stage. It should be possible to build the placement policies and the
> > scheduling decisions from schednuma, autonuma, some combination of the
> > above or something completely different on top of patches 1-35.
> > 
> > Peter, Ingo, Andrea?
> 
> The patches 1-35 looks a great foundation so I think they'd be an
> ideal candidate for a first upstream inclusion.
> 

Thanks.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/