[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1446291.TgLDtXqY7q@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:43:59 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
wency@...fujitsu.com, lenb@...nel.org, toshi.kani@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove device operation
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 11:22:47 AM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> As discussed in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1581581/
> the driver core remove function needs to always succeed. This means we need
> to know that the device can be successfully removed before acpi_bus_trim /
> acpi_bus_hot_remove_device are called. This can cause panics when OSPM-initiated
> eject or driver unbind of memory devices fails e.g with:
>
> echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
> echo "PNP0C80:XX" > /sys/bus/acpi/drivers/acpi_memhotplug/unbind
>
> since the ACPI core goes ahead and ejects the device regardless of whether the
> the memory is still in use or not.
So the question is, does the ACPI core have to do that and if so, then why?
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists