[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1353150776.14327.13.camel@lb-tlvb-eilong.il.broadcom.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 13:12:56 +0200
From: "Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@...adcom.com>
To: "Joe Perches" <joe@...ches.com>
cc: "David Rientjes" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Andy Whitcroft" <apw@...onical.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add double empty line check
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 16:50 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
Hi Joe, thanks for replying.
> On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 22:04 +0200, Eilon Greenstein wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 11:55 -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> > > On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Eilon Greenstein wrote:
> > > This is fairly common in all the acpi code where variables declared in a
> > > function are separated from the code in a function.
> > >
> >
> > Indeed, I see that you do use it in some functions.
> >
> > Maybe we can limit it only to the networking tree (similar to the
> > networking comments style) or if the ACPI is the exception, we can apply
> > to all but ACPI.
>
> I'm not sure this should be done.
> Double line spacing has some utility and
> is pretty common.
Since adding double empty line can cause a patch to be rejected, we
should have an easy way to catch it before submitting.
> Perhaps make this a --strict/CHK option
> and also perhaps make sure this isn't
> emitted on consecutive lines.
Indeed, CHK makes more sense. I wanted to have a warning per redundant
line, but since it can be annoying when adding 3 or more empty lines
intentionally, I will issue one comment for consecutive lines.
v2 is on its way.
Thanks,
Eilon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists