[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1353157457-3649-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:04:12 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, pjt@...gle.com,
preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/5] enable runnable load avg in load balance
This patchset try to consider runnable load avg when do cpu load comparison
in load balance.
I had seen preeti's enabling before patch finished, but I still think considing
runnable load avg on rq is may a more natrual way.
BTW, I am thinking if 2 times decay for cpu_load is too complicate? one for
runnable time, another for CPU_LOAD_IDX. I think I missed the decay reason
for CPU_LOAD_IDX. Could anyone like do me favor to give some hints of this?
Best Regards!
Alex
[RFC PATCH 1/5] sched: get rq runnable load average for load balance
[RFC PATCH 2/5] sched: update rq runnable load average in time
[RFC PATCH 3/5] sched: using runnable load avg in cpu_load and
[RFC PATCH 4/5] sched: consider runnable load average in wake_affine
[RFC PATCH 5/5] sched: revert 'Introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists