[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50A7D2F0.1050901@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:39:52 +0530
From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
CC: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, pjt@...gle.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] sched: consider runnable load average in wake_affine
and move_tasks
Hi Alex,
On 11/17/2012 06:34 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> Except using runnable load average in background, wake_affine and
> move_tasks is also the key functions in load balance. We need consider
> the runnable load average in them in order to the apple to apple load
> comparison in load balance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> @@ -4229,7 +4233,7 @@ static int move_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
> if (throttled_lb_pair(task_group(p), env->src_cpu, env->dst_cpu))
> goto next;
>
> - load = task_h_load(p);
> + load = task_h_load(p) * p->se.avg.load_avg_contrib;
Shouldn't the above be just load = p->se.avg.load_avg_contrib? This
metric already has considered p->se.load.weight.task_h_load(p) returns
the same.
>
> if (sched_feat(LB_MIN) && load < 16 && !env->failed)
> goto next;
>
Regards
Preeti U Murthy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists