linux-kernel - [PATCH v8 11/46] x86, mm: Fixup code testing if a pfn is direct mapped

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1353123563-3103-12-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Date:	Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:38:48 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v8 11/46] x86, mm: Fixup code testing if a pfn is direct mapped

From: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>

Update code that previously assumed pfns [ 0 - max_low_pfn_mapped ) and
[ 4GB - max_pfn_mapped ) were always direct mapped, to now look up
pfn_mapped ranges instead.

-v2: change applying sequence to keep git bisecting working.
     so add dummy pfn_range_is_mapped(). - Yinghai Lu

Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h |    8 ++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c         |    8 +++-----
 arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c       |    7 +++----
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h
index e21fdd1..45aae6e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_types.h
@@ -51,6 +51,14 @@ static inline phys_addr_t get_max_mapped(void)
 	return (phys_addr_t)max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT;
 }
 
+static inline bool pfn_range_is_mapped(unsigned long start_pfn,
+					unsigned long end_pfn)
+{
+	return end_pfn <= max_low_pfn_mapped ||
+	       (end_pfn > (1UL << (32 - PAGE_SHIFT)) &&
+		end_pfn <= max_pfn_mapped);
+}
+
 extern unsigned long init_memory_mapping(unsigned long start,
 					 unsigned long end);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index f7e98a2..9619ba6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -676,12 +676,10 @@ static void __cpuinit init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 		 * benefit in doing so.
 		 */
 		if (!rdmsrl_safe(MSR_K8_TSEG_ADDR, &tseg)) {
+			unsigned long pfn = tseg >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+
 			printk(KERN_DEBUG "tseg: %010llx\n", tseg);
-			if ((tseg>>PMD_SHIFT) <
-				(max_low_pfn_mapped>>(PMD_SHIFT-PAGE_SHIFT)) ||
-				((tseg>>PMD_SHIFT) <
-				(max_pfn_mapped>>(PMD_SHIFT-PAGE_SHIFT)) &&
-				(tseg>>PMD_SHIFT) >= (1ULL<<(32 - PMD_SHIFT))))
+			if (pfn_range_is_mapped(pfn, pfn + 1))
 				set_memory_4k((unsigned long)__va(tseg), 1);
 		}
 	}
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
index ad44391..36e53f0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
@@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ void __init efi_enter_virtual_mode(void)
 	efi_memory_desc_t *md, *prev_md = NULL;
 	efi_status_t status;
 	unsigned long size;
-	u64 end, systab, end_pfn;
+	u64 end, systab, start_pfn, end_pfn;
 	void *p, *va, *new_memmap = NULL;
 	int count = 0;
 
@@ -888,10 +888,9 @@ void __init efi_enter_virtual_mode(void)
 		size = md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
 		end = md->phys_addr + size;
 
+		start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(md->phys_addr);
 		end_pfn = PFN_UP(end);
-		if (end_pfn <= max_low_pfn_mapped
-		    || (end_pfn > (1UL << (32 - PAGE_SHIFT))
-			&& end_pfn <= max_pfn_mapped)) {
+		if (pfn_range_is_mapped(start_pfn, end_pfn)) {
 			va = __va(md->phys_addr);
 
 			if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB))
-- 
1.7.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/