[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121118193235.GA9859@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:32:35 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm]
percpu_rw_semaphore-reimplement-to-not-block-the-readers-unnecessari
ly.fix
On 11/16, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:27:44 +0100
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > lib/percpu-rwsem.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>
> y'know, this looks like a great pile of useless bloat for single-CPU
> machines. Maybe add a CONFIG_SMP=n variant which simply calls the
> regular rwsem operations?
Yes, I thought about this and probably I'll send the patch...
But note that the regular down_read() won't be actually faster if
there is no writer, and it doesn't allow to add other features.
I'll try to think, perhaps it would be enough to add a couple of
"ifdef CONFIG_SMP" into this code, say, to avoid __percpu.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists