[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9E44E06DBBA23A489DED933DBC291A850FD7A645@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 03:14:28 +0000
From: "Chen, Jun D" <jun.d.chen@...el.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, "Bi, Chao" <chao.bi@...el.com>,
serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"Gorby, Russ" <russ.gorby@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Wu, Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] serial: ifx6x60: ifx_spi_write don't need to do
mrdy_assert when fifo is not empty.
Hi,
I make this patch on your tty-next tree, Do I need to make it on the branch 3.7-rc6 against?
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@...uxfoundation.org]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 8:39 PM
To: Chen, Jun D
Cc: Alan Cox; Bi, Chao; serial; Gorby, Russ; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Wu, Fengguang
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: ifx6x60: ifx_spi_write don't need to do mrdy_assert when fifo is not empty.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 06:08:37AM -0500, Jun Chen wrote:
>
> This patch check whether the fifo lenth is empty before writing new
> data to fifo.If condition is true,ifx_spi_write need to trigger one
> mrdy_assert. If condition is false,the mrdy_assert will be trigger by the next ifx_spi_io.
>
> Cc: Bi Chao <chao.bi@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Jun <jun.d.chen@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/ifx6x60.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
What tree did you make this against? It doesn't apply to my tty-next tree at all :(
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists