[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1211191158550.5042@wniryva.cad.erqung.pbz>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:27:53 +0530 (IST)
From: P J P <ppandit@...hat.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, halfdog <me@...fdog.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exec: do not leave bprm->interp on stack
+-- On Sun, 18 Nov 2012, Kees Cook wrote --+
| This is the second problem. I view this as less critical because it's only
| 64 instead of 4, but it certainly should be solved as well.
I don't mean to be rude, but the patch I had sent solves both of these
problems with much less performance hit.
Please see -> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/26/442
Worst case: instead of 2^6(64) recursions, it would make only 4 calls to
request_module() function. find_module() does not resolve module aliases, it
could be removed from the above patch.
Please pardon me if I came across rude or offensive, I'm only trying to make a
case.
--
Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Security Response Team
DB7A 84C5 D3F9 7CD1 B5EB C939 D048 7860 3655 602B
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists