[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <873906vumh.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:56:22 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The bug of iput() removal from flusher thread?
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> writes:
> Hi,
>
> In 169ebd90131b2ffca74bb2dbe7eeacd39fb83714 commit, writeback doesn't
> __iget()/iput() anymore.
>
> This means nobody moves the inode to lru list. I.e.
>
> new_inode()
> dirty_inode()
> iput_final()
> /* keep inode without adding lru */
> flush indoes
> /* clean inode is not on lru */
>
> I noticed this situation in my FS though, I think the same bug is on all
> FSes of linus tree too, after this commit.
>
> Am I missing the something?
This seems to be reproducible by the following,
#!/bin/sh
for i in $(seq -w 1000); do
for j in $(seq -w 1000); do
for k in $(seq -w 1000); do
mkdir -p $i/$j
echo $i/$j/$k > $i/$j/$k
echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
done
done
done
Some inodes never be reclaimed, and ls -l frees those inodes (stat(2)
does iget/iput).
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists