linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmc: Standardise capability type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121119092725.GA553@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:27:25 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	arnd@...db.de, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Standardise capability type

On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Chris Ball wrote:

> Hi Lee, 
> 
> Pushed to mmc-next for 3.8 with a minor change:
> 
> On Wed, Nov 14 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> > There are discrepancies with regards to how MMC capabilities
> > are carried throughout the subsystem. Let's standardise them
> > to elevate any confusion.
> 
> I think you meant "eliminate" here.  :)  Thanks,

No, I meant alleviate. :)

Do you want me to re-submit, or have you fixed up?

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/