[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50AA1A2A.2070504@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:38:18 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@...com>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] target/iblock: Add WRITE_SAME w/ UNMAP=0 emulation
support
Il 15/11/2012 21:01, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) ha scritto:
> WRITE SAME always has a payload, regardless of the UNMAP bit value.
>
> For WRITE SAME with UNMAP=0, it's extremely important; that's how
> what to write is specified.
>
> For WRITE SAME with UNMAP=1, the device server is required to check
> that the payload matches the data that is returned for unmapped LBAs.
> lf LBPRZ=1 (read zeros for unmapped LBAs), that means checking that
> the payload has all zeros. In sbc3r33, this rule is tucked away in
> model section 4.7.3.4.3, not the command section 5.41.
Does that mean that LBPRZ=0, LPBWS=1 is practically an invalid
combination? Because there's no real way for the device server to
perform the check successfully.
Paolo
> I would like to change that rule (it's a nuisance and a performance
> burden), but that's the current rule going into SBC-3 letter ballot.
>
> Changing WRITE SAME with UNMAP=1 to ignore the payload would provide
> essentially the same functionality as changing the UNMAP command to
> be mandatory, not just a hint; both approaches have been discussed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists