[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121119150733.GD13607@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:07:33 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@....ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/32] perf powerpc: Use uapi/unistd.h to fix build error
Em Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 08:29:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer escreveu:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org> wrote:
> > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Use the 'unistd.h' from arch/powerpc/include/uapi to build the perf tool.
>
> This would work for powerpc, but at least s390x and ARM have the same
> build issue. Why would we fix this piecemeal per-arch?
>
> David Howells has a patch that _should_ fix it for all of them at once.
> Is there a reason that isn't going in?
David rebased his patch on top of my perf/core branch, I just tested it
and all works as expected, so I'd say he should push that branch
upstream as I can't just cherry pick some csets, it needs a merge that
involves more than just tools/perf AFAIK.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists