[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121119141458.883e6535.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:14:58 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: catch possible NULL audit buffers
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:00:51 -0800
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> It's possible for audit_log_start() to return NULL. Handle it in the
> various callers.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -272,6 +272,8 @@ static int audit_log_config_change(char *function_name, int new, int old,
> int rc = 0;
>
> ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE);
> + if (unlikely(!ab))
> + return rc;
Returning success here looks suspicious. audit_do_config_change() will
fail to take its wtf-just-happened action (which
audit_log_config_change() duplicates, btw).
Meanwhile audit_receive_msg() is off living in a happy land where
nothing ever goes wrong.
> audit_log_format(ab, "%s=%d old=%d auid=%u ses=%u", function_name, new,
> old, from_kuid(&init_user_ns, loginuid), sessionid);
> if (sid) {
> @@ -619,6 +621,8 @@ static int audit_log_common_recv_msg(struct audit_buffer **ab, u16 msg_type,
> }
>
> *ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, msg_type);
> + if (unlikely(!*ab))
> + return rc;
Also looks fishy.
> audit_log_format(*ab, "pid=%d uid=%u auid=%u ses=%u",
> task_tgid_vnr(current),
> from_kuid(&init_user_ns, current_uid()),
>
> ...
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists