linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Implement device tree support for ab8500 BM Devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121119045753.GA28159@lizard>
Date:	Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:57:53 -0800
From:	Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
To:	Rajanikanth HV <rajanikanth.hv@...aro.org>
Cc:	rob.herring@...xeda.com, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Francesco Lavra <francescolavra.fl@...il.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org Devel" <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
	STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com,
	"Rajanikanth H.V" <rajanikanth.hv@...ricsson.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Implement device tree support for ab8500 BM Devices

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:28:59AM +0530, Rajanikanth HV wrote:
> > FWIW, I fixed these warnings.
> >
> >   CHECK   drivers/power/ab8500_bmdata.c
> > drivers/power/ab8500_bmdata.c:146:23: warning: symbol 'temp_to_batres_tbl_thermistor' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > drivers/power/ab8500_bmdata.c:160:23: warning: symbol 'temp_to_batres_tbl_ext_thermistor' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > drivers/power/ab8500_bmdata.c:171:23: warning: symbol 'temp_to_batres_tbl_9100' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > drivers/power/ab8500_bmdata.c:181:28: warning: symbol 'bat_type_thermistor' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > drivers/power/ab8500_bmdata.c:267:28: warning: symbol 'bat_type_ext_thermistor' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >
> > Plus fixed a few stylistic issues.
> 
> thanks anton for validating my patch, you seems to have older version
> of patch set,
> i am rebasing  new version of patch set to 3.7-rc5, will communicate asap.

Can you please rebase the new work on top of current battery tree (i.e. on
top of the patches that you've sent)? Or that would be too much burden?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/