[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121120004356.GC4483@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:43:58 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>, lrg@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: max8973: add regulator driver support
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:52:42AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Thanks for submitting this driver! The notion of DVS regulators was new to
> me, so, I checked http://www.ti.com/lit/an/sbva020/sbva020.pdf for a short
> description. After that I had a look at a couple of existing DVS regulator
Do you just mean regulators that have a quick voltage change ability/
> drivers in the tree. Well, I came to two conclusions so far: (1) The
> current regulator API is not very well suitable for such regulators. I
> would imagine, one would need two methods: for setting the "normal" and
> the DVS voltage. Instead of this drivers are trying to be smart at
> guessing, which voltage the user is trying to set now... (2) Drivers do
> this in different ways and at least out of the 2 drivers I looked at both
> have bugs and different ones at that. I'll send a separate email,
> describing what I found suspicious in them.
The thing I'd like to see factored out here is the LRU mechanism,
otherwise I think the situation is pretty good. Some of the older
devices should use a different scheme to modern ones as the hardware
they have to interoperate is different.
> Of course, all the above was just my DVS-newbie impression, which can very
> well be absolutely wrong.
>
> >
> > Add regulator driver for this device.
*ALWAYS* delete irrelevant text when replying.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists