[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50AB2A1A.6040606@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:58:34 +0800
From: Jaegeuk Hanse <jaegeuk.hanse@...il.com>
To: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, cmetcalf@...era.com,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/12] memory-hotplug: unregister memory section on
SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
On 11/20/2012 02:55 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 11/20/2012 02:22 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
>> On 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>>>
>>> Currently __remove_section for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP does nothing. But
>>> even if
>>> we use SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, we can unregister the memory_section.
>>>
>>> So the patch add unregister_memory_section() into __remove_section().
>> Hi Yasuaki,
>>
>> In order to review this patch, I should dig sparse memory codes in
>> advance. But I have some confuse of codes. Why need encode/decode mem
>> map instead of set mem_map to ms->section_mem_map directly?
> The memmap is aligned, and the low bits are zero. We store some information
> in these bits. So we need to encode/decode memmap here.
Hi Congyang,
Thanks for you reponse. But I mean why return (unsigned long)(mem_map -
(section_nr_to_pfn(pnum))); in function sparse_encode_mem_map, and then
return ((struct page *)coded_mem_map) + section_nr_to_pfn(pnum); in
funtion sparse_decode_mem_map instead of just store mem_map in
ms->section_mep_map directly.
Regards,
Jaegeuk
>
> Thanks
> Wen Congyang
>
>> Regards,
>> Jaegeuk
>>
>>> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
>>> CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
>>> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
>>> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
>>> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
>>> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>>> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
>>> CC: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>>> ---
>>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> index ca07433..66a79a7 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> @@ -286,11 +286,14 @@ static int __meminit __add_section(int nid,
>>> struct zone *zone,
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
>>> static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms)
>>> {
>>> - /*
>>> - * XXX: Freeing memmap with vmemmap is not implement yet.
>>> - * This should be removed later.
>>> - */
>>> - return -EBUSY;
>>> + int ret = -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + if (!valid_section(ms))
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + ret = unregister_memory_section(ms);
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> }
>>> #else
>>> static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms)
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists