| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1353396032.17856.7.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:20:32 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: MSI: Restore read_msi_msg_desc(); add
get_cached_msi_msg_desc()
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 14:56 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> commit 2ca1af9aa3285c6a5f103ed31ad09f7399fc65d7 "PCI: MSI: Remove
> unsafe and unnecessary hardware access" changed read_msi_msg_desc() to
> return the last MSI message written instead of reading it from the
> device, since it may be called while the device is in a reduced
> power state.
Looks reasonable... Jesse ?
Cheers,
Ben.
> However, the pSeries platform code really does need to read messages
> from the device, since they are initially written by firmware.
> Therefore:
> - Restore the previous behaviour of read_msi_msg_desc()
> - Add new functions get_cached_msi_msg{,_desc}() which return the
> last MSI message written
> - Use the new functions where appropriate
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> ---
> Compile-tested only.
>
> Ben.
>
> arch/ia64/kernel/msi_ia64.c | 2 +-
> arch/ia64/sn/kernel/msi_sn.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pci/msi.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/linux/msi.h | 2 +
> 5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/msi_ia64.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/msi_ia64.c
> index 6c89228..4a746ea 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/msi_ia64.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/msi_ia64.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ static int ia64_set_msi_irq_affinity(unsigned int irq,
> if (irq_prepare_move(irq, cpu))
> return -1;
>
> - read_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
> + get_cached_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
>
> addr = msg.address_lo;
> addr &= MSI_ADDR_DEST_ID_MASK;
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/msi_sn.c b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/msi_sn.c
> index ebfdd6a..0c72dd4 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/msi_sn.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/msi_sn.c
> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static int sn_set_msi_irq_affinity(unsigned int irq,
> * Release XIO resources for the old MSI PCI address
> */
>
> - read_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
> + get_cached_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
> sn_pdev = (struct pcidev_info *)sn_irq_info->irq_pciioinfo;
> pdev = sn_pdev->pdi_linux_pcidev;
> provider = SN_PCIDEV_BUSPROVIDER(pdev);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> index e41ed24..4dc0084 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> @@ -3397,7 +3397,7 @@ static int set_msi_irq_affinity(unsigned int irq, const struct cpumask *mask)
>
> cfg = desc->chip_data;
>
> - read_msi_msg_desc(desc, &msg);
> + get_cached_msi_msg_desc(desc, &msg);
>
> msg.data &= ~MSI_DATA_VECTOR_MASK;
> msg.data |= MSI_DATA_VECTOR(cfg->vector);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> index 4c14f31..69b7be3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -197,9 +197,46 @@ void read_msi_msg_desc(struct irq_desc *desc, struct msi_msg *msg)
> {
> struct msi_desc *entry = get_irq_desc_msi(desc);
>
> - /* We do not touch the hardware (which may not even be
> - * accessible at the moment) but return the last message
> - * written. Assert that this is valid, assuming that
> + BUG_ON(entry->dev->current_state != PCI_D0);
> +
> + if (entry->msi_attrib.is_msix) {
> + void __iomem *base = entry->mask_base +
> + entry->msi_attrib.entry_nr * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE;
> +
> + msg->address_lo = readl(base + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_LOWER_ADDR);
> + msg->address_hi = readl(base + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_UPPER_ADDR);
> + msg->data = readl(base + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_DATA);
> + } else {
> + struct pci_dev *dev = entry->dev;
> + int pos = entry->msi_attrib.pos;
> + u16 data;
> +
> + pci_read_config_dword(dev, msi_lower_address_reg(pos),
> + &msg->address_lo);
> + if (entry->msi_attrib.is_64) {
> + pci_read_config_dword(dev, msi_upper_address_reg(pos),
> + &msg->address_hi);
> + pci_read_config_word(dev, msi_data_reg(pos, 1), &data);
> + } else {
> + msg->address_hi = 0;
> + pci_read_config_word(dev, msi_data_reg(pos, 0), &data);
> + }
> + msg->data = data;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void read_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg)
> +{
> + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +
> + read_msi_msg_desc(desc, msg);
> +}
> +
> +void get_cached_msi_msg_desc(struct irq_desc *desc, struct msi_msg *msg)
> +{
> + struct msi_desc *entry = get_irq_desc_msi(desc);
> +
> + /* Assert that the cache is valid, assuming that
> * valid messages are not all-zeroes. */
> BUG_ON(!(entry->msg.address_hi | entry->msg.address_lo |
> entry->msg.data));
> @@ -207,11 +244,11 @@ void read_msi_msg_desc(struct irq_desc *desc, struct msi_msg *msg)
> *msg = entry->msg;
> }
>
> -void read_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg)
> +void get_cached_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg)
> {
> struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
>
> - read_msi_msg_desc(desc, msg);
> + get_cached_msi_msg_desc(desc, msg);
> }
>
> void write_msi_msg_desc(struct irq_desc *desc, struct msi_msg *msg)
> diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
> index 6991ab5..91b05c1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/msi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/msi.h
> @@ -14,8 +14,10 @@ struct irq_desc;
> extern void mask_msi_irq(unsigned int irq);
> extern void unmask_msi_irq(unsigned int irq);
> extern void read_msi_msg_desc(struct irq_desc *desc, struct msi_msg *msg);
> +extern void get_cached_msi_msg_desc(struct irq_desc *desc, struct msi_msg *msg);
> extern void write_msi_msg_desc(struct irq_desc *desc, struct msi_msg *msg);
> extern void read_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg);
> +extern void get_cached_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg);
> extern void write_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg);
>
> struct msi_desc {
> --
> 1.6.2.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists