[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpokQDSFHPVGkneAas+6XK09VKUQV-b0H8uqGYfXMJGyFbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:24:16 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
spear-devel@...t.st.com,
Vipul Kumar Samar <vipulkumar.samar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Input: spear-keyboard: Add clk_{un}prepare() support
On 20 November 2012 14:17, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> No, not really, it just does not work well with devm_* patches that got
> applied: on removal you unprepare clock as the very first operation and
> then devm_* does the rest which is wrong order.
Nice. I don't expect the order would do anything wrong, as we aren't
touching any registers between unpreparing clock and devm_ undo stuff.
> I am looking at adding dem_* for clocks.
You mean, adding devm_clk_prepare, devm_clk_enable, devm_clk_prepare_enable ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists