linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] Input: spear-keyboard: Add clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:24:16 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	spear-devel@...t.st.com,
	Vipul Kumar Samar <vipulkumar.samar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Input: spear-keyboard: Add clk_{un}prepare() support

On 20 November 2012 14:17, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:

> No, not really, it just does not work well with devm_* patches that got
> applied: on removal you unprepare clock as the very first operation and
> then devm_* does the rest which is wrong order.

Nice. I don't expect the order would do anything wrong, as we aren't
touching any registers between unpreparing clock and devm_ undo stuff.

> I am looking at adding dem_* for clocks.

You mean, adding devm_clk_prepare, devm_clk_enable, devm_clk_prepare_enable ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/