linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 06/12] memory-hotplug: unregister memory section on SPARSEMEM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50AB4F6D.3050002@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:37:49 +0800
From:	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Jaegeuk Hanse <jaegeuk.hanse@...il.com>
CC:	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, cmetcalf@...era.com,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/12] memory-hotplug: unregister memory section on
 SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP

At 11/20/2012 02:58 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
> On 11/20/2012 02:55 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 11/20/2012 02:22 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
>>> On 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>>> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>>>>
>>>> Currently __remove_section for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP does nothing. But
>>>> even if
>>>> we use SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, we can unregister the memory_section.
>>>>
>>>> So the patch add unregister_memory_section() into __remove_section().
>>> Hi Yasuaki,
>>>
>>> In order to review this patch, I should dig sparse memory codes in
>>> advance. But I have some confuse of codes. Why need encode/decode mem
>>> map instead of set mem_map to ms->section_mem_map directly?
>> The memmap is aligned, and the low bits are zero. We store some
>> information
>> in these bits. So we need to encode/decode memmap here.
> 
> Hi Congyang,
> 
> Thanks for you reponse. But I mean why return (unsigned long)(mem_map -
> (section_nr_to_pfn(pnum))); in function sparse_encode_mem_map, and then
> return ((struct page *)coded_mem_map) + section_nr_to_pfn(pnum); in
> funtion sparse_decode_mem_map instead of just store mem_map in
> ms->section_mep_map directly.

I don't know why. I try to find the reason, but I don't find any
place to use the pfn stored in the mem_map except in the decode
function. Maybe the designer doesn't want us to access the mem_map
directly.

Thanks
Wen Congyang

> 
> Regards,
> Jaegeuk
> 
>>
>> Thanks
>> Wen Congyang
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jaegeuk
>>>
>>>> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
>>>> CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
>>>> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
>>>> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
>>>> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
>>>> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>>>> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
>>>> CC: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    mm/memory_hotplug.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>>>>    1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>>> index ca07433..66a79a7 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>>> @@ -286,11 +286,14 @@ static int __meminit __add_section(int nid,
>>>> struct zone *zone,
>>>>    #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
>>>>    static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section
>>>> *ms)
>>>>    {
>>>> -    /*
>>>> -     * XXX: Freeing memmap with vmemmap is not implement yet.
>>>> -     *      This should be removed later.
>>>> -     */
>>>> -    return -EBUSY;
>>>> +    int ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (!valid_section(ms))
>>>> +        return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +    ret = unregister_memory_section(ms);
>>>> +
>>>> +    return ret;
>>>>    }
>>>>    #else
>>>>    static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section
>>>> *ms)
>>>
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/