linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] CLK: uninline clk_prepare() and clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:10:06 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] CLK: uninline clk_prepare() and clk_unprepare()

On 20 November 2012 15:02, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 01:22:17AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> We'll need to invoke clk_unprepare() via a pointer in our devm_*
>> conversion so let's uninline the pair.
>
> NAK.  This breaks non-common clock using implementations.

Hi Russell,

Dummy routines for non-common clock are still there. Sorry, couldn't get
why this will break those platforms:

+static inline int clk_prepare(struct clk *clk)
+{
+       might_sleep();
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
+{
+       might_sleep();
+}
+

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/