| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20121120100751.GB1408@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:07:51 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, tytso@....edu, david@...morbit.com,
jmoyer@...hat.com, bpm@....com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
jack@...e.cz, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ext4: honor the O_SYNC flag for aysnchronous
direct I/O requests
On Mon 19-11-12 23:41:31, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> If a file is opened with O_SYNC|O_DIRECT, the drive cache does not get
> flushed after the write completion. Instead, it's flushed *before* the
> I/O is sent to the disk (in __generic_file_aio_write). This patch
> attempts to fix that problem by marking an I/O as requiring a cache
> flush in endio processing. I'll send a follow-on patch to the
> generic write code to get rid of the bogus generic_write_sync call
> when EIOCBQUEUED is returned.
>
> From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
> [darrick.wong@...cle.com: Rework original patch to reflect a subsequent
> ext4 reorganization]
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 9 +++++
> fs/ext4/file.c | 2 +
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 6 +++
> fs/ext4/page-io.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> fs/ext4/super.c | 13 +++++++
> 5 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 3c20de1..f5a0b89 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ struct mpage_da_data {
> #define EXT4_IO_END_ERROR 0x0002
> #define EXT4_IO_END_QUEUED 0x0004
> #define EXT4_IO_END_DIRECT 0x0008
> +#define EXT4_IO_END_NEEDS_SYNC 0x0010
>
> struct ext4_io_page {
> struct page *p_page;
> @@ -1279,6 +1280,9 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {
> /* workqueue for dio unwritten */
> struct workqueue_struct *dio_unwritten_wq;
>
> + /* workqueue for aio+dio+o_sync disk cache flushing */
> + struct workqueue_struct *aio_dio_flush_wq;
> +
Umm, I'm not completely decided whether we really need a separate
workqueue. But it doesn't cost too much so I guess it makes some sense -
fsync() is rather heavy so syncing won't starve extent conversion...
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/page-io.c b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> index 68e896e..cda013a 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,50 @@ void ext4_free_io_end(ext4_io_end_t *io)
> kmem_cache_free(io_end_cachep, io);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * This function is called in the completion path for AIO O_SYNC|O_DIRECT
> + * writes, and also in the fsync path. The purpose is to ensure that the
> + * disk caches for the journal and data devices are flushed.
> + */
> +static int ext4_end_io_do_flush(ext4_io_end_t *io)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = io->inode;
> + tid_t commit_tid;
> + bool needs_barrier = false;
> + journal_t *journal = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal;
> + int barriers_enabled = test_opt(inode->i_sb, BARRIER);
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (!barriers_enabled)
> + return 0;
This is definitely wrong. Even if barriers are disabled, we may need to
push out some buffers or commit a transaction.
> +
> + /*
> + * If we are running in nojournal mode, just flush the disk
> + * cache and return.
> + */
> + if (!journal)
> + return blkdev_issue_flush(inode->i_sb->s_bdev, GFP_NOIO, NULL);
And this is wrong as well - you need to do work similar to what
ext4_sync_file() does. Actually it would be *much* better if these two
sites used the same helper function. Which also poses an interesting
question about locking - do we need i_mutex or not? Forcing a transaction
commit is definitely OK without it, similarly as grabbing transaction ids
from inode or ext4_should_journal_data() test. __sync_inode() call seems
to be OK without i_mutex as well so I believe we can just get rid of it
(getting i_mutex from the workqueue is a locking nightmare we don't want to
return to).
> +
> + if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode)) {
> + ret = ext4_force_commit(inode->i_sb);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + commit_tid = io->iocb->ki_filp->f_flags & __O_SYNC ?
> + EXT4_I(inode)->i_sync_tid : EXT4_I(inode)->i_datasync_tid;
> + if (!jbd2_trans_will_send_data_barrier(journal, commit_tid))
> + needs_barrier = true;
> +
> + jbd2_log_start_commit(journal, commit_tid);
> + ret = jbd2_log_wait_commit(journal, commit_tid);
> +
> + if (!ret && needs_barrier)
> + ret = blkdev_issue_flush(inode->i_sb->s_bdev, GFP_NOIO, NULL);
> +
> +out:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /* check a range of space and convert unwritten extents to written. */
> static int ext4_end_io(ext4_io_end_t *io)
> {
...
> @@ -149,8 +209,11 @@ void ext4_add_complete_io(ext4_io_end_t *io_end)
> struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - BUG_ON(!(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN));
> - wq = EXT4_SB(io_end->inode->i_sb)->dio_unwritten_wq;
> + BUG_ON(!ext4_io_end_deferred(io_end));
> + if (io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)
> + wq = EXT4_SB(io_end->inode->i_sb)->dio_unwritten_wq;
> + else
> + wq = EXT4_SB(io_end->inode->i_sb)->aio_dio_flush_wq;
Umm, I'd prefer if we used aio_dio_flush_wq when EXT4_IO_END_NEEDS_SYNC
is set. That way slow syncing works will be always offloaded to a separate
workqueue.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists