[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <0c8a01cdc715$1312c410$39384c30$%kim@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:49:19 +0900
From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
To: 'Sachin Kamat' <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, patches@...aro.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] pinctrl: Samsung: Do not initialise statics to 0
Sachin Kamat wrote:
>
> Static variables are initialised to 0 by GCC.
> Fixes the following checkpatch error:
> ERROR: do not initialise statics to 0 or NULL
> FILE: pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c:50:
> static unsigned int pin_base = 0;
>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-
> samsung.c
> index 81c9896..36f8875 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ struct pin_config {
> { "samsung,pin-pud-pdn", PINCFG_TYPE_PUD_PDN },
> };
>
> -static unsigned int pin_base = 0;
> +static unsigned int pin_base;
>
> static inline struct samsung_pin_bank *gc_to_pin_bank(struct gpio_chip
> *gc)
> {
> --
> 1.7.4.1
Looks OK to me.
Linus, can I pick this up in my tree?
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists