[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201211202124.FIA41997.SFtOOOLMQFVFHJ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:24:49 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: keescook@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: james.l.morris@...cle.com, john.johansen@...onical.com,
serge.hallyn@...ntu.com, eparis@...hat.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Yama: remove locking from delete path
Kees Cook wrote:
> Instead of locking the list during a delete, mark entries as invalid
> and trigger a workqueue to clean them up. This lets us easily handle
> task_free from interrupt context.
> @@ -57,9 +80,12 @@ static int yama_ptracer_add(struct task_struct *tracer,
>
> added->tracee = tracee;
> added->tracer = tracer;
> + added->invalid = false;
>
> - spin_lock_bh(&ptracer_relations_lock);
> + spin_lock(&ptracer_relations_lock);
Can't you use
spin_lock_irqsave(&ptracer_relations_lock, flags);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ptracer_relations_lock, flags);
instead of adding ->invalid ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists