| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <12657869.yQS4p6Y8j3@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:05:26 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
w.sang@...gutronix.de, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, khali@...ux-fr.org,
ben-linux@...ff.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 12:29:43 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> ACPI 5 introduced SPISerialBus resource that allows us to enumerate and
> configure the SPI slave devices behind the SPI controller. This patch adds
> support for this to the SPI core.
>
> In addition we bind ACPI nodes to SPI devices. This makes it possible for
> the slave drivers to get the ACPI handle for further configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> index 84c2861..3ae5351 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/kthread.h>
> +#include <linux/ioport.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>
> static void spidev_release(struct device *dev)
> {
> @@ -93,6 +95,10 @@ static int spi_match_device(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
> if (of_driver_match_device(dev, drv))
> return 1;
>
> + /* Then try ACPI */
> + if (acpi_driver_match_device(dev, drv))
> + return 1;
> +
> if (sdrv->id_table)
> return !!spi_match_id(sdrv->id_table, spi);
>
> @@ -888,6 +894,112 @@ static void of_register_spi_devices(struct spi_master *master)
> static void of_register_spi_devices(struct spi_master *master) { }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +static int acpi_spi_add_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
> +{
> + struct acpi_resource_spi_serialbus *sb;
> + struct spi_device *spi = data;
> + struct resource r;
> +
> + switch (ares->type) {
> + case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ:
> + case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_IRQ:
It is not necessary to check the resource type for IRQ resources here,
because acpi_dev_resource_interrupt() will do it for you anyway. :-)
So, I would first check if the resource type is ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_SERIAL_BUS
(and populate the spi_device fields if so) and then do something like this:
if (acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(ares, 0, &r)) {
if (spi->irq < 0)
spi->irq = r.start;
return 1;
}
We don't even need to memset(), because we're not going to use that resource
object going forward.
> + /* Only use the first interrupt resource and skip the rest */
> + memset(&r, 0, sizeof(r));
> + if (spi->irq < 0 && acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(ares, 0, &r))
> + spi->irq = r.start;
> + return 1;
> +
> + case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_SERIAL_BUS:
> + sb = &ares->data.spi_serial_bus;
> + if (sb->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_SERIAL_TYPE_SPI) {
> + spi->chip_select = sb->device_selection;
> + spi->max_speed_hz = sb->connection_speed;
> +
> + if (sb->clock_phase == ACPI_SPI_SECOND_PHASE)
> + spi->mode |= SPI_CPHA;
> + if (sb->clock_polarity == ACPI_SPI_START_HIGH)
> + spi->mode |= SPI_CPOL;
> + if (sb->device_polarity == ACPI_SPI_ACTIVE_HIGH)
> + spi->mode |= SPI_CS_HIGH;
> +
> + return 1;
> + }
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
We're not interested in any resources except for the above, so I think we
can just always return 1 from this function, or am I missing anything?
> +}
> +
> +static acpi_status acpi_spi_add_device(acpi_handle handle, u32 level,
> + void *data, void **return_value)
> +{
> + struct spi_master *master = data;
> + struct list_head resource_list;
> + struct acpi_device *adev;
> + struct spi_device *spi;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev))
> + return AE_OK;
> + if (acpi_bus_get_status(adev) || !adev->status.present)
> + return AE_OK;
> +
> + spi = spi_alloc_device(master);
> + if (!spi) {
> + dev_err(&master->dev, "failed to allocate SPI device for %s\n",
> + dev_name(&adev->dev));
> + return AE_NO_MEMORY;
> + }
> +
> + ACPI_HANDLE_SET(&spi->dev, handle);
> + spi->irq = -1;
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
> + ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list,
> + acpi_spi_add_resource, spi);
acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list); can be done here (the list
is going to be empty anyway if acpi_spi_add_resource() always returns 1)
and then you won't need the fail_put_dev label.
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto fail_put_dev;
> +
> + acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
> +
> + if (!spi->max_speed_hz)
> + goto fail_put_dev;
> +
> + strlcpy(spi->modalias, dev_name(&adev->dev), sizeof(spi->modalias));
> + if (spi_add_device(spi)) {
> + dev_err(&master->dev, "failed to add SPI device %s from ACPI\n",
> + dev_name(&adev->dev));
> + goto fail_put_dev;
> + }
> +
> + return AE_OK;
> +
> +fail_put_dev:
> + spi_dev_put(spi);
> +
> + return AE_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static void acpi_register_spi_devices(struct spi_master *master)
> +{
> + acpi_status status;
> + acpi_handle handle;
> +
> + handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&master->dev);
> + if (!handle)
> + return;
> +
> + status = acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, handle, 1,
> + acpi_spi_add_device, NULL,
> + master, NULL);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + dev_warn(&master->dev, "failed to enumerate SPI slaves\n");
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void acpi_register_spi_devices(struct spi_master *master) {}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
> +
> static void spi_master_release(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct spi_master *master;
> @@ -1023,8 +1135,9 @@ int spi_register_master(struct spi_master *master)
> spi_match_master_to_boardinfo(master, &bi->board_info);
> mutex_unlock(&board_lock);
>
> - /* Register devices from the device tree */
> + /* Register devices from the device tree and ACPI */
> of_register_spi_devices(master);
> + acpi_register_spi_devices(master);
> done:
> return status;
> }
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists