[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50AAED8E.4030201@realsil.com.cn>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:40:14 +0800
From: wwang <wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn>
To: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
CC: "sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"oakad@...oo.com" <oakad@...oo.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mmc/host/rtsx: Configure SD_CFG2 register in sd_rw_multi
于 2012年11月20日 10:21, Chris Ball 写道:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to be pedantic, but:
>
> On Mon, Nov 19 2012, wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn wrote:
>> For Realtek card reader, internal regsiter SD_CFG2 should be configured
>> before transferring data. In the prior version, the value of this register
>> has been calculated, but forgotten to write back to the internal register.
> With what consequences? Was the data transfer failing? Under which
> circumstances?
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Chris.
Hi Chris:
It's about compatibility issue. The default value of SD_CFG2 is proper
for writing data. But for reading sequence, the timing is not good
enough. So in some extreme circumstance, card reader may sample the
response data from the card as good even if the data is wrong. And this
will cause the bad consequence.
Shall I modify the commit and resend the patchset again?
BR,
Wei WANG
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists