linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 4/7] mm: introduce compaction and migration for ballooned pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20121120153324.7119bd3b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:33:24 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc:	Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/7] mm: introduce compaction and migration for
 ballooned pages

On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:16:02 +0000
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 01:05:51AM -0200, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> > Memory fragmentation introduced by ballooning might reduce significantly
> > the number of 2MB contiguous memory blocks that can be used within a guest,
> > thus imposing performance penalties associated with the reduced number of
> > transparent huge pages that could be used by the guest workload.
> > 
> > This patch introduces the helper functions as well as the necessary changes
> > to teach compaction and migration bits how to cope with pages which are
> > part of a guest memory balloon, in order to make them movable by memory
> > compaction procedures.
> > 
>
> ...
>
> > --- a/mm/compaction.c
> > +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/backing-dev.h>
> >  #include <linux/sysctl.h>
> >  #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> > +#include <linux/balloon_compaction.h>
> >  #include "internal.h"
> >  
> >  #if defined CONFIG_COMPACTION || defined CONFIG_CMA
> > @@ -565,9 +566,24 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
> >  			goto next_pageblock;
> >  		}
> >  
> > -		/* Check may be lockless but that's ok as we recheck later */
> > -		if (!PageLRU(page))
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Check may be lockless but that's ok as we recheck later.
> > +		 * It's possible to migrate LRU pages and balloon pages
> > +		 * Skip any other type of page
> > +		 */
> > +		if (!PageLRU(page)) {
> > +			if (unlikely(balloon_page_movable(page))) {
> 
> Because it's lockless, it really seems that the barrier stuck down there
> is unnecessary. At worst you get a temporarily incorrect answer that you
> recheck later under page lock in balloon_page_isolate.

What happened with this?

Also: what barrier?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/