| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <50AC5BC1.9050200@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:42:41 +0800
From: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
To: Jaegeuk Hanse <jaegeuk.hanse@...il.com>
CC: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, cmetcalf@...era.com,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/12] memory-hotplug: unregister memory section on
SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
At 11/21/2012 12:22 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
> On 11/21/2012 11:05 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 11/20/2012 07:16 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
>>> On 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>>> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>>>>
>>>> Currently __remove_section for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP does nothing. But
>>>> even if
>>>> we use SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, we can unregister the memory_section.
>>>>
>>>> So the patch add unregister_memory_section() into __remove_section().
>>> Hi Yasuaki,
>>>
>>> I have a question about these sparse vmemmap memory related patches. Hot
>>> add memory need allocated vmemmap pages, but this time is allocated by
>>> buddy system. How can gurantee virtual address is continuous to the
>>> address allocated before? If not continuous, page_to_pfn and pfn_to_page
>>> can't work correctly.
>> vmemmap has its virtual address range:
>> ffffea0000000000 - ffffeaffffffffff (=40 bits) virtual memory map (1TB)
>>
>> We allocate memory from buddy system to store struct page, and its
>> virtual
>> address isn't in this range. So we should update the page table:
>>
>> kmalloc_section_memmap()
>> sparse_mem_map_populate()
>> pfn_to_page() // get the virtual address in the vmemmap range
>> vmemmap_populate() // we update page table here
>>
>> When we use vmemmap, page_to_pfn() always returns address in the vmemmap
>> range, not the address that kmalloc() returns. So the virtual address
>> is continuous.
>
> Hi Congyang,
>
> Another question about memory hotplug. During hot remove memory, it will
> also call memblock_remove to remove related memblock.
IIRC, we don't touch memblock when hot-add/hot-remove memory. memblock is
only used for bootmem allocator. I think it isn't used after booting.
> memblock_remove()
> __memblock_remove()
> memblock_isolate_range()
> memblock_remove_region()
>
> But memblock_isolate_range() only record fully contained regions,
> regions which are partial overlapped just be splitted instead of record.
> So these partial overlapped regions can't be removed. Where I miss?
No, memblock_isolate_range() can deal with partial overlapped region.
=====================
if (rbase < base) {
/*
* @rgn intersects from below. Split and continue
* to process the next region - the new top half.
*/
rgn->base = base;
rgn->size -= base - rbase;
type->total_size -= base - rbase;
memblock_insert_region(type, i, rbase, base - rbase,
memblock_get_region_node(rgn));
} else if (rend > end) {
/*
* @rgn intersects from above. Split and redo the
* current region - the new bottom half.
*/
rgn->base = end;
rgn->size -= end - rbase;
type->total_size -= end - rbase;
memblock_insert_region(type, i--, rbase, end - rbase,
memblock_get_region_node(rgn));
=====================
If the region is partial overlapped region, we will split the old region into
two regions. After doing this, it is full contained region now.
Thanks
Wen Congyang
>
> Regards,
> Jaegeuk
>
>> Thanks
>> Wen Congyang
>>> Regards,
>>> Jaegeuk
>>>
>>>> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
>>>> CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
>>>> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
>>>> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
>>>> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
>>>> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>>>> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
>>>> CC: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>>> index ca07433..66a79a7 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>>> @@ -286,11 +286,14 @@ static int __meminit __add_section(int nid,
>>>> struct zone *zone,
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
>>>> static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section
>>>> *ms)
>>>> {
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * XXX: Freeing memmap with vmemmap is not implement yet.
>>>> - * This should be removed later.
>>>> - */
>>>> - return -EBUSY;
>>>> + int ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!valid_section(ms))
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = unregister_memory_section(ms);
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> }
>>>> #else
>>>> static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section
>>>> *ms)
>>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists